Определение per genus proximum et differentiam specificam и юридический язык В. В. Оглезнев, В. А. Суровцев
Material type:
ArticleOther title: Definition per genus proximum et differentiam specificam and legal language [Parallel title]Subject(s): Аристотель 384-322 до н. э | Бентам, Иеремия 1748-1832 | Харт, Герберт Лайонел Адольфус 1907-1992 | юридический язык | история философииGenre/Form: статьи в журналах Online resources: Click here to access online
In:
Schole. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция Т. 9, вып. 2. С. 228-240Abstract: This essay is concerned with the applicability in modern conceptual jurisprudence of a particular methodology for defining concepts, namely, per genus proximum et differentiam specificam. We explicate the origin of this method and how it was applied by Aristotle, Porphyry, and Boethius, arguing that H. L. A. Hart’s views about the “open texture” of language, which is context-sensitive, call into question the applicability of this methodology in
modern conceptual jurisprudence.
Библиогр.: с. 240
This essay is concerned with the applicability in modern conceptual jurisprudence of a particular methodology for defining concepts, namely, per genus proximum et differentiam specificam. We explicate the origin of this method and how it was applied by Aristotle, Porphyry, and Boethius, arguing that H. L. A. Hart’s views about the “open texture” of language, which is context-sensitive, call into question the applicability of this methodology in
modern conceptual jurisprudence.
There are no comments on this title.