"Философия Плотина" Эмиля Брейе в контексте дискуссий о мышлении Ума /И. В. Берестов

Берестов, Игорь Владимирович.
Электронный ресурс
Источник
Schole. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция 2015 Т. 9, вып. 2. С. 394-414
Примечания
Рец. на кн.: Брейе, Эмиль. Философия Плотина / пер. с фр. и вступ. ст. А. С. Гагонина. СПб. : Владимир Даль, 2012. 392 с.
Паралельное заглавие
"The philosophy of Plotinus" by Émile Bréhier in the context of the discussions on Nous’ thinking.
Аннотация
The article offers a critical analysis of the famous studies by Émile Bréhier of the philosophy of Plotinus. His book, published in French in 1928 and a series of later articles, along with two Wayne Hankey’s studies on Bréhier are now translated into Russian for the first time. I present an overview of A. S. Gagonin’s preface to the book and outline the content of the book chapter after chapter. I find it important to indicate the target audience of the book and the aspects in which it can still be useful to modern readers. Then I try to provide a critical analysis of Bréhier’s interpretation of Plotinus’ doctrine of Nous. Based on some modern Anglo-American studies of Plotinus’ philosophy I demonstrate that Bréhier’s evaluation of Plotinus’ doctrine of Nous, as “lifeless” and “heterogeneous” is too hasty. Similarly his still influential statement that the doctrine of Nous in Plotinus is confused with the doctrine of the One, and consequently not rooted in the genuine context of the Greek philosophy, can also be evaluated as a hasty judgment.
Всего оценка: 0
Нет записей для отображения.
 
 
 
02982nab a2200349 c 4500
001
 
 
vtls000532897
003
 
 
RU-ToGU
005
 
 
20190120213700.0
007
 
 
cr |
008
 
 
190120|2015    ru      s         c rus d
035
$a to000532897
039
9
$a 201901202137 $b staff $c 201901131857 $d staff $c 201710121143 $d cat34 $c 201701231009 $d cat202 $y 201605131155 $z VLOAD
040
$a RU-ToGU $b rus $c RU-ToGU
100
1
$a Берестов, Игорь Владимирович
245
1
1
$a "Философия Плотина" Эмиля Брейе в контексте дискуссий о мышлении Ума $c И. В. Берестов
246
1
1
$a "The philosophy of Plotinus" by Émile Bréhier in the context of the discussions on Nous’ thinking.
500
$a Рец. на кн.: Брейе, Эмиль. Философия Плотина / пер. с фр. и вступ. ст. А. С. Гагонина. СПб. : Владимир Даль, 2012. 392 с.
504
$a Библиогр.: с. 413-414
520
3
$a The article offers a critical analysis of the famous studies by Émile Bréhier of the philosophy of Plotinus. His book, published in French in 1928 and a series of later articles, along with two Wayne Hankey’s studies on Bréhier are now translated into Russian for the first time. I present an overview of A. S. Gagonin’s preface to the book and outline the content of the book chapter after chapter. I find it important to indicate the target audience of the book and the aspects in which it can still be useful to modern readers. Then I try to provide a critical analysis of Bréhier’s interpretation of Plotinus’ doctrine of Nous. Based on some modern Anglo-American studies of Plotinus’ philosophy I demonstrate that Bréhier’s evaluation of Plotinus’ doctrine of Nous, as “lifeless” and “heterogeneous” is too hasty. Similarly his still influential statement that the doctrine of Nous in Plotinus is confused with the doctrine of the One, and consequently not rooted in the genuine context of the Greek philosophy, can also be evaluated as a hasty judgment.
600
1
4
$a Брейе, Эмиль
600
0
4
$a Плотин $d ок. 204-270
653
$a рецензии
653
$a интеллектуализм
653
$a античная философия
655
4
$a статьи в журналах
710
2
$a Томский государственный университет $b Философский факультет $b Научные подразделения ФсФ
773
0
$t Schole. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция $d 2015 $g Т. 9, вып. 2. С. 394-414 $x 1995-4328
852
4
$a RU-ToGU
856
7
$u http://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Repository/vtls:000532897
908
$a статья
999
$a VIRTUA
999
$a VTLSSORT0070*0080*0350*0400*1000*2450*2460*5000*5040*5200*6000*6001*6530*6531*6532*6550*7100*7730*8520*8560*9080*9992
Нет комментариев.
Предмет
Брейе, Эмиль
Плотин ок. 204-270
статьи в журналах
Резюме
The article offers a critical analysis of the famous studies by Émile Bréhier of the philosophy of Plotinus. His book, published in French in 1928 and a series of later articles, along with two Wayne Hankey’s studies on Bréhier are now translated into Russian for the first time. I present an overview of A. S. Gagonin’s preface to the book and outline the content of the book chapter after chapter. I find it important to indicate the target audience of the book and the aspects in which it can still be useful to modern readers. Then I try to provide a critical analysis of Bréhier’s interpretation of Plotinus’ doctrine of Nous. Based on some modern Anglo-American studies of Plotinus’ philosophy I demonstrate that Bréhier’s evaluation of Plotinus’ doctrine of Nous, as “lifeless” and “heterogeneous” is too hasty. Similarly his still influential statement that the doctrine of Nous in Plotinus is confused with the doctrine of the One, and consequently not rooted in the genuine context of the Greek philosophy, can also be evaluated as a hasty judgment.